Editorial standards · Process
Sources & Methodology
Primary sources
We prefer legislation and regulations, regulator publications, government and NHS material, official service providers, primary research and authoritative industry documentation where practical. Secondary sources may provide context. Important factual claims should retain links to specific relevant sources.
Editorial review
Discovered regulatory material is queued, reviewed and either approved or rejected by an administrator. Discovery never automatically creates public content. Review should also check the relevant jurisdiction, publication date and limits of the available evidence.
How we maintain independence
GamRight records sources and requires human review before regulatory discoveries can be approved.
Our editorial approach:
- We identify the source of regulatory facts.
- We distinguish established facts, editorial interpretation, estimates or model outputs, and material uncertainty.
- Educational calculators illustrate defined assumptions. They do not predict an individual's results or provide personalised advice.
- Structured directories are not rankings. Provider features are checked against dated sources, and known coverage limits are stated where relevant.
- We provide a route for corrections and source updates.
03 · Corrections and updates
Corrections
Readers can report a factual error or provide an updated primary source through the contact and corrections page. Corrections are assessed against the cited evidence and recorded in the published material where appropriate.
Read the transparency standard